State v. Strohbehn
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Scott District Court. — -Hon. P. B. Wolpe, Judge. Defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of rape, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
There is no statement in the abstract that we have all the evidence, nor does it purport to contain the entire record. True, we have a copy of the certificate of the shorthand reporter, and of the bill of exceptions signed by the judge, but they are not sufficient. State v. Hogan, 81 Iowa, 747 (45 N. W. Rep. 903); State v. Day, 58 Iowa, 678 (12 N. W. Rep. 207); State v. French, 96 Iowa, 255; (65 N. W. Rep. 166). On the first page of the abstract, we find this statement: “Agreed Abstract of Record.77 This would ordinarily be sufficient, in the absence of a denial, to show that the abstract was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- State v. FrenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- State v. HoganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
3Cited by1 opinion
- Olson v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1902