Legal Opinion

Worthy v. Michigan

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 24, 2000No. 00-71219PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

EDMUNDS, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Hon. Kym Worthy, Romona McKinney and Reginald Crawford’s motion for preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs seek a preliminary injunction barring the State of Michigan from enforcing a provision of the Michigan Constitution which prohibits a sitting judge from becoming “nominated for or elected to an elective office other than a judicial office during the period of [the judge’s] service and for one year…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re DunleavySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  2. In Re HodgdonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  3. In Re DunleavySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API