Legal Opinion
Hacker v. Dickman
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1996No. 1994-2400PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 75 Ohio St.3d 118.] HACKER ET AL., APPELLEES, v. DICKMAN ET AL.; STATE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANIES ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Hacker v. Dickman,
1996-Ohio-98.] Insurance—Contract language using pronouns “you” and “your” not ambiguous when definitions section of policy defines the terms. __________________ (No. 94-2400—Submitted November 14, 1995—Decided March 4, 1996.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Erie County, No E-93-65. __________________ {¶ 1} This appeal stems from Charles and Dianne Hacker’s (“Hackers”) supplemental…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Buckeye Union Insurance v. PriceOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Hacker v. DickmanOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fed. Ins. Co. v. Executive Coach Luxury Travel, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Tuohy v. Taylor, 4-06-23 (7-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Bryan Publishing Co. v. Kuser, 7-07-17 (6-2-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Merz v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co., Ca2006-08-203 (5-14-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Jordan v. Nationwide Mutual, Unpublished Decision (5-31-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.