Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Bruce Bonallo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1988No. 87-3085PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Defendant/appellant Daniel Bonallo appeals his conviction on 12 counts of bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (1984). The appeal requires us to determine whether a scheme to defraud a bank under that statute requires that the misrepresentation actually precede the bank’s transfer of money or property to the perpetrator. We also consider the sufficiency of the indictment as well as the sufficiency of the evidence. Bonallo also contests the admissibility of certain evidence. We affirm his conviction on 11 of the 12 counts.
I. FACTS
Daniel Bonallo worked at American Data…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hammerschmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- United States v. Nick StavroulakisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Michael J. McNeese and Laura ConwellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. George Michael ShipseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Crystal Mason, Edward YoungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. David M. Saks, United States of America v. James Doyle SpruillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.