Legal Opinion

Casey v. Levine

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 2001No. S-99-079PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

This medical malpractice appeal presents the question whether the continuing treatment doctrine that tolls the statute of limitations against a physician should be extended to the alleged negligent acts of a hospital’s nursing staff. We conclude in this case that in a malpractice claim against a hospital for the negligence of its nursing staff, the doctrine does not toll the statute of limitations past the date of the patient’s discharge from the hospital.

Jacqueline Casey brought this medical and hospital malpractice claim against Michael A. Levine, M.D.; Andrew Robertson, M.D.; and Methodist…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Young v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Horton v. Carolina Medicorp, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Jensen v. Archbishop Bergan Mercy HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Carol Marmo v. Tyson Fresh MeatsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. Thone v. Regional West Medical CenterNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Carruth v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Keys v. GuthmannNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Claypool v. HibberdNebraska Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API