Legal Opinion
Claypool v. Hibberd
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 2001No. S-99-1223PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Appellant, Dorothy Claypool, as personal representative of the estate of her son, Carlos Olivo, seeks damages for the wrongful death of Carlos against appellees Furnas County, Nebraska, and two of its law enforcement officers, Deputies Terry Hibberd and William Hoyt. Claypool seeks damages for Carlos’ death under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act and for damages for an alleged violation of Carlos’ federal rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Supp. IV 1998). Appellees moved for summary judgment. The trial court found that the facts established by the evidence did not give rise…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kneipp v. TedderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Perry v. S.N.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Aw v. Lancaster County School Dist. 0001Nebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Interest of Ty M.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Maxwell v. MonteyNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Dalmer v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Erickson v. U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.