Legal Opinion

Mallon v. Cudahey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 2001No. 99C-32826, A109349PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

The state registered a 1999 New York judgment in Oregon pursuant to ORS 110.303 et seq., the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA). The trial court vacated the registration. The state appeals, and mother cross-appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in holding that the statute of limitations had run on the obligations that the 1999 judgment embodied. We reverse and remand.

Mother and respondent met in New York and were involved in a relationship there for approximately two and a half years. Mother gave birth to a child in September 1967 in New York. Respondent denied that he was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Westwood Homeowners Ass'n v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mendez v. Steen Trucking, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Delehant v. Board on Police Standards & TrainingOregon Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Oregon DCS ex rel. State of Alaska v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Simons v. SimonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API