Legal Opinion

Clark v. Board of Police Pension Fund Commissioners

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1937No. 26420. Department OnePublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

While serving as a policeman in the city of Yakima on October 31,1931, E. Paul Clark was disabled as a result of accidental injury sustained while riding a motorcycle. His injuries consisted of a fracture of the lower end of the right femur, approximately two inches above the condyles, and a fracture of the third and fourth metatarsal bones.

Clark was confined in the hospital for three months, and thereafter at his home, in a cast, for a period of several weeks. He was unable to walk without assistance for a continuous period of about four months following the accident. As a result of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Metcalf v. . McAdooNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Simmons v. Policemen's Pension Com., DealSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Lerch v. MorganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Simmons v. Policemen's Pension CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Callecod v. Washington State PatrolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. Boyles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Brooks v. Pension BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Newman v. City of Oakland Retirement BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Newlun v. Department of Retirement SystemsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API