Legal Opinion

Willgohs v. Buerman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 1962No. 38,422PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

Plaintiff is a distributor of semen used for artificial breeding of dairy and beef cattle. On May 21, 1959, he entered into a contract with defendant, whereby the latter was given the exclusive right to be plaintiff’s “technician” in the township of Munson and portions of several other townships in Steams County. The contract provided that plaintiff was to sell, and that defendant was to purchase from plaintiff, all semen…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Winthrop Resources Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation v. Eaton Hydraulics, Inc., Formerly Known as Vickers, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  2. Clausen & Sons, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  3. Dave Gustafson & Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Bowles Sub Parcel A, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  5. Dean Van Horn Consulting Associates, Inc. v. WoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API