Legal Opinion
RODRIGUEZ-CARRILLO
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1999No. ID 3413PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3413 In re Jose Antonio RODRIGUEZ-CARRILLO, Respondent File A30 247 851 - Oakdale Decided October 12, 1999 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A remand of the record for issuance of a full and separate decision apprising the parties of the legal basis of the Immigration Judge’s decision is not required under Matter of A-P-,
22 I&N Dec. 3375
(BIA 1999), where the respondent had notice of the factual and legal basis of the decision and had an adequate opportunity to contest them on appeal, the uncontested facts…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Marcello v. BondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Trevor A. Waldron v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Rafael Montilla v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- S-HBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
- D-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011
- Karayana Hadayat v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- SAELEEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2000
- Mendoza Ramirez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.