Legal Opinion
Clarence C. Seman v. Coplay Cement Company F/d/b/a United States Cement Company. United States Cement Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 8, 1994No. 93-3544PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge:
This appeal follows final judgment in favor of the appellee, Clarence C. Seman, on his age discrimination claim against his former employer, appellant United States Cement Company (“U.S. Cement”), pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 623(a). 1 The trial jury found that Seman’s age was a determining factor in U.S. Cement’s decision to terminate his employment; that Seman would have been employed by U.S. Cement’s successor company had Seman’s age not been a factor in the termination decision, and that Seman was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Barbara R. Sheridan v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Jacques AmblardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Burt N. Sempier v. Johnson & HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Armbruster v. Unisys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Calvin Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil ToolsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.