Legal Opinion
Worrell v. ELLIOTT & FRANTZ
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 28, 2011No. Civil Action 09-4443PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion. JOSEPH H. RODRIGUEZ, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are cross motions of the parties for summary judgment. Plaintiffs George and Mary Worrell (“Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against Defendant Elliott & Frantz under theories of negligence and products liability. 1 George Worrell (“Worrell”) was injured at work when he attempted to secure a hose on an excavator that he was responsible for transporting from New Jersey to Pennsylvania. Worrell was employed by Defendant Winzinger, Inc., which is an excavating company and named as a defendant for discovery purposes only.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Alvaro Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc. And Playskool Baby, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kemly v. Werner Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Ford v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- Kuhar v. Thompson ManufacturingUtah Supreme Court · 2024
- FAILLA v. GEORGE'S FOODS, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- GILL v. PETCO HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMPANY INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.