State v. Haynes
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, J.
Defendant was charged with murder. She moved for a pre-trial omnibus hearing to determine "the voluntariness and admissibility of statements allegedly made by the defendant to police officers or other persons after the alleged act set out in the indictment.” The trial court ruled some statements admissible and others inadmissible. The state appeals, and defendant cross-appeals. There has not yet been a trial on the charge.
John Bruno and Charles Haynes, defendant’s husband, were arrested on March 10 and 11, respectively, for the murder of Pamela Bruno. After she learned of her husband’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. SuttlesOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. SuttlesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
3Cited by4 opinions
- Application of HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Whipple v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Application of HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 1980