Legal Opinion

Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Professional Men's Investment, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 6, 1964No. 14785_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

337 F.2d 1011

HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

v.

PROFESSIONAL MEN'S INVESTMENT, INC., (Defendant) and H.

Hershey Cohen, etc., et al., (Intervenors) John R.

McKeever, Receiver of Professional Men's

Investment, Inc., (Intervenor).

No. 14785.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 24, 1964.

Decided Oct. 6, 1964.

Thomas Lewis Jones, Pittsburgh, Pa. (White, Jones & Gregg, William T. Creehan, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Harry R. Levy, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.

Before HASTIE and FORMAN, Circuit Judges, and KIRKPATRICK, District judge.

2Per curiam

1

The question here, as…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Professional Men's Investment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Van Dusseldorp v. Kim Lean HoDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2014
  2. AEG Westinghouse Transportation Systems, Inc. v. OEM Industrial Corp. (In Re OEM Industrial Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee of Technical Equities Corp. (In Re Technical Equities Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API