Barker v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Justice.
This appeal by appellant-Kenneth L. Barker from a conviction of obtaining property by false pretenses under § 6-3-106, W.S.1977 1 , presents only one issue which we need resolve, namely:
Was § 6-3-106, W.S.1977 (the false-pretenses statute, fn. 1, supra), repealed by § 6-3-110, W.S.1977 2 (the insufficient-funds-check law), insofar as the use of a check with insufficient funds is concerned, thereby precluding a conviction under § 6-3-106?
We will hold that it was not, and affirm the trial court.
We parse the aforementioned statutes as follows:
The insufficient-funds statute — §…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Christiansen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- State v. RoderickIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. LaRoseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Driver v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. VidaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lopez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. FoleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Haskell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. GorenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Trevino v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006