Legal Opinion

Lopez v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1990No. 89-143PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

Yvonne Lopez (Lopez) challenges the sufficiency of the evidence in this case to establish the essential elements of the crime of obtaining property by false pretenses in violation of § 6-3-407(a), W.S. 1977 (June 1988 Repl.). 1 She was tried by the judge without a jury and found guilty. Lopez contends that the evidence would, at most, justify a conviction for the offense of fraud by check, but is not sufficient to establish the crime of obtaining property by false pretenses. We agree with the district court that the evidence was adequate to establish all of the essential…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murray v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Schiefer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Miller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Fitzgerald v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Driver v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Barnes v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Arner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Ivan Lee Sweets, Sr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Stice v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API