Legal Opinion · Dissent

Oldham v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 30, 1998No. 1350-94Published

1DissentPrice, Judge

I.Procedural background of the case.

The Court of Appeals held that Appellant was denied her right to counsel during the time in which to file a motion for new trial. Oldham v. State, 889 S.W.2d 461, 462-63 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th DistJ 1994). The Court of Appeals used Rule 2(b) to suspend that time period, and the court remanded the case to the trial court so Appellant could file a motion for new trial. Id. at 463.

The State’s petition for discretionary review raised two grounds for review:

1. Whose burden is it to show that an appellant was or was not abandoned by counsel during a critical…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Olivo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API