Oldham v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1DissentPrice, Judge
I.Procedural background of the case.
The Court of Appeals held that Appellant was denied her right to counsel during the time in which to file a motion for new trial. Oldham v. State, 889 S.W.2d 461, 462-63 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th DistJ 1994). The Court of Appeals used Rule 2(b) to suspend that time period, and the court remanded the case to the trial court so Appellant could file a motion for new trial. Id. at 463.
The State’s petition for discretionary review raised two grounds for review:
1. Whose burden is it to show that an appellant was or was not abandoned by counsel during a critical…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Olivo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.