Legal Opinion

Roty v. Battelle Mem'l Inst.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 2017No. 16AP-266PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunner, J.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Ann Roty and Mary Neff (collectively, "Roty and Neff"), appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas entered on April 5, 2016 granting a motion for summary judgment filed by defendants-appellees, Battelle Memorial Institute, Jeffrey Perko, Jane Cozzarelli, Jeffrey Caspers, Gwendolyn Von Holten, Staci Palmer, and David Evans (collectively, "Battelle"). Because we find that the trial court erred in concluding that company-wide statistics showing the ages of employees retained and terminated during a 2013 reduction in force were so irrelevant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mauzy v. Kelly Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Dahl v. Battelle Memorial Institute, Unpublished Decision (7-22-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Wasserstrom v. Battelle Mem. Inst.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Evans v. Summit Behavorial HealthcareOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. HDDA, L.L.C. v. VasaniOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. Roty v. Battelle Mem. Inst.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Reece v. Davis-WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
  4. Roty v. Battelle Mem'l Inst.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API