Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lunding v. New York Tax Appeals Tribunal

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 21, 1998No. 96-1462Published

1Dissent

Justice Ginsburg, with whom The Chief Justice and Justice Kennedy join,

dissenting.

New York and other States follow the Federal Government’s lead1 in according an income tax deduction for alimony to resident taxpayers only.2 That tax practice, I *316conclude, does not offend the nondiscrimination principle embodied in the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV, § 2. I therefore dissent from the Court’s opinion.

r — n

To put this case in proper perspective, it is helpful to recognize not only that alimony payments are “surely a personal matter,” ante, at 310; in addition, alimony payments are…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Ward v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API