Legal Opinion

United States v. Lois E. Hilton Ford

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 11, 1987No. 86-1098PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

Today the government argues that Congress intended by the Federal Magistrates Act to grant to judges of United States District Courts authority to delegate to a magistrate as an “additional duty” the power to preside over the selection of the jury in felony cases. Given the grave constitutional questions such a construction would pose and the history and structure of the legislation creating the office of United States Magistrates, we are not persuaded of such congressional purpose.

We hold that the district court erred in allowing a magistrate to preside…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. Mang Sun Wong, Chi Hong Lam and Hang Fang Ko, Mang Sun WongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. John Musacchia and Joseph GambinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API