Legal Opinion

Vitko v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1981No. Appeal, No. 838 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

Lenny E. Vitko (claimant) has appealed from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirming a referee’s decision which denied him trade readjustment allowance benefits because he was disqualified for unemployment compensation pursuant to Section 402(a) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(a), for his failure, without good cause, to apply for suitable work. We vacate and remand.

The claimant contends that he had good cause to refuse to report for an employment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Katz v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Hoffman v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Losch v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Peda v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API