Hoffman v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MacPhail,
Carol M. Hoffman has appealed from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), which affirmed the referee’s denial of benefits to Claimant because she quit her employment without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature. Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(b)(1).
Claimant argues here that she terminated her employment for the necessitous and compelling reason of health problems, which were caused by her cold, damp work environment.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. CejaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Katz v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brennan v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Novak v. PA. INSURANCE DEPT.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Williams v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Ehmann v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Glammer v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.