Legal Opinion

Essick v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Joseph Essick (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming a referee’s denial of benefits to Claimant. We affirm.

In January 1994, Claimant filed for unemployment compensation benefits with the Interstate Claims Office, which denied his claim. Claimant appealed and, following an April 7, 1994 hearing, the referee affirmed, determining that Claimant was an unemployed business person rather than an unemployed worker and, thus, ineligible for benefits under section 402(h) of the Unemploy*670ment Compensation Law (Law)1 and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Starinieri Unemployment Compensation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Blackwell v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Geever v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Friedman v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. C. Butorac v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  2. G.I. Nicholson v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. M. Dolby v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. R. Perri v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API