Legal Opinion
Eastern Oil Transport, Inc. v. United States
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided April 30, 1976No. 74-5-CIV-7PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
2Per curiam
This is an action by Eastern Oil Transport, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Eastern Oil) against the United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission (hereinafter referred to as the ICC or the Commission) to enjoin and set aside an order of the ICC denying Eastern Oil a certificate of public convenience and necessity to transport certain products in interstate commerce. Jurisdiction is invoked under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336, 1398, 2284, 2321-2325; 49 U.S.C. §§ 17(9), 305(g), 305(h); and 5 U.S.C. §§ 702-706. A three-judge court was convened, pursuant to the…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Allied Van Lines Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969
- Twin City Freight, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
- Howard Hall Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- American Transfer & Storage Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- B. J. McAdams, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- B. J. McAdams Inc. v. The Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, (Two Cases). B. J. McAdams Inc. v. The Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, and Midwest Emery Freight System, Inc. And Hilt Truck Line, Inc., Intervenor-RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977