Roderick v. Hough
West Virginia Supreme Court
1DissentCalhouh, Judge
Believing that the majority opinion is predicated upon misconceptions of certain legal principles and upon misapplication of others, I respectfully dissent. In my judgment, the majority opinion cites no prior decision of this Court, and no other legal authority, touching the precise question presented.
*751It seems logical to commence a consideration of the question by endeavoring to understand what is meant, legally speaking, by the term, “retroactive statute.” That term is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary (4th Ed.) as follows: “A statute which creates a new obligation on transactions or…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- State v. General Daniel Morgan Post No. 548West Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
- Coal & Coke Ry. Co. v. ConleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. HardenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.