Legal Opinion · Dissent

Roderick v. Hough

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1961No. 12104Published

1DissentCalhouh, Judge

Believing that the majority opinion is predicated upon misconceptions of certain legal principles and upon misapplication of others, I respectfully dissent. In my judgment, the majority opinion cites no prior decision of this Court, and no other legal authority, touching the precise question presented.

*751It seems logical to commence a consideration of the question by endeavoring to understand what is meant, legally speaking, by the term, “retroactive statute.” That term is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary (4th Ed.) as follows: “A statute which creates a new obligation on transactions or…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. State v. General Daniel Morgan Post No. 548West Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Coal & Coke Ry. Co. v. ConleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. HardenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API