Legal Opinion
Flood v. Town of Shidler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 18, 1927No. 17710PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MASON, V. C. J.
The plaintiff in error, Ray Flood, commenced this action to recover of the town of Shidler the sum of $6,250 for services, as a civil engineer, alleged to have been rendered said town pursuant to a written contract, dated May 5, 1923, which was attached to his petition and which he alleges was entered into between the town of Shidler, acting through the chairman of its board of trustees, and the plaintiff.
Briefly -summarized, said contract provided : That the town of Shidler employed the plaintiff as official engineer of said town for a period of two years from date of said…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- O'Neil Engineering Co. v. Incorporated Town of RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Hall v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by12 opinions
- Faught v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- City of Del City v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 114Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Boardman Co. v. Board of Com'rs, Ellis Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Town of Red Fork v. Gantt-Baker Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Protest of Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. v. Excise Board of Bryan CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.