Legal Opinion

Bentley v. Grewing

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1981No. 18420PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUGHES, Justice.

Dorothy J. Bentley, as the devisee of Ruth Richards’ last will and testament, brought suit to remove a cloud upon her asserted title to an overriding royalty interest. In construing an assignment made by Ruth Richards to Richard E. Grewing, the trial court denied her claim on the grounds that Mrs. Richards possessed no interest to which Mrs. Bentley could succeed. Her appeal is now before us.

We affirm.

Mrs. Bentley claims an overriding royalty interest in an oil and gas lease covering the “West 100 acres” which is comprised of the west 50 acres from the North 105 acres…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  2. Gibson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Brite v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Luse v. Crispin CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Monarch Tile Sales v. Frost National Bank of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Jones v. Cooper Industries, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  3. Beneficial Standard Life Insurance Co. v. Trinity National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  4. Hillhaven, Inc. v. Care One, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Mathis v. United Investors Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API