Bice v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*355OPINION
SAM NUCHIA, Justice.
Appellant was charged with driving while intoxicated. Appellant filed motions to suppress observations and opinions flowing from an allegedly illegal stop. Appellant also made a motion to suppress statements made by him during custodial interrogation. The judge denied those motions, and appellant pled guilty. The judge sentenced appellant to 180 days confinement probated for six months and a $2,000 fine, of which $1,000 was probated. Appellant contends the court erred in denying his motions to suppress. We affirm.
FACTS RELEVANT TO THE MOTION TO SUPPRESS
Officer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Maddox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Harris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
- Collins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- Singleton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- Gregory Wayne Mandrell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
- Gregory Wayne Mandrell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
- Singleton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.