Legal Opinion
Pfister Chemical Co. v. Romano
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 4, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Brogan, Chief Justice.
The prosecutor of this writ was convicted in the Recorder’s Court of the borough of Ridge-field of violating a municipal ordinance, the object of which was to abate nuisances resulting from the discharge of fumes, smoke, soot, gaseous vapors, and the like.
The validity of the ordinance is challenged by the prosecutor on the ground that it is in conflict with the provisions of article 10, section 7, of the Home Rule act, chapter 152, Pamph. L. 1917; Cum. Supp. Comp. Stat. 1911-1924, p. .2105, § *136-1007. That article reads as follows:
“7. The governing body of every…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Massinger v. City of MillvilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
- Sawicki v. KeronSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- Fields v. DuffySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- State v. GouldySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
- Friedman v. MainesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hunter v. Mayor & Council of the Township of TeaneckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
- Board of Commissioners v. GrodeckiPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1943
- Studerus Oil Co. v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
- Verona v. ShalitNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- State v. McCormack Terminal, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983