Legal Opinion

Northwest Farm Bureau Insurance v. Althauser

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 9, 1988No. 85-3-336; CA A42835PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

This is a foreclosure action. Northwest Farm Bureau Insurance (plaintiff) issued the Althausers (defendants) 1 a homeowners’ insurance contract which included fire insurance coverage and mortgagee protection. After a fire, plaintiff paid the mortgagees. Plaintiff claims that it is subrogated to the mortgagees’ rights, because its contract with defendants was made void by defendants’ material misrepresentations concerning the fire loss. The trial court entered a summary judgment of foreclosure, and defendants appeal. We affirm.

Defendants owned a house which was subject to two mortgages.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States F. & G. Co. v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Centennial InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. v. RamseyOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Scott v. Northwestern Agencies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Money Store/Massachusetts, Inc. v. Hingham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  2. Meemic Insurance Company v. Angela JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Meemic Insurance Company v. Angela JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Meemic Insurance Company v. Angela JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API