Healy v. Metropolitan Utilities District
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
This action was 'commenced by plaintiff as a resident taxpayer of the city of Omaha and a user of the gas and water facilities of the Metropolitan Utilities District of Omaha, for himself and all others similarly situated, for the benefit of such district, and against such district, its directors and their respective surety companies, and Dana Van Dusen, to recover for attorney’s fees paid to Van Dusen in excess of the maximum salary of $5,000 per year permitted by section 14-1020, R. S. 1943. A motion for a summary judgment of dismissal was sustained and the plaintiff appeals.
The petition…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Broderick Wood Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Firemen's Mut. Ins. Co. v. Aponaug Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- Hanna v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Otteman v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Otteman v. Interstate Fire and Casualty CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- Eden v. KlaasNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Miller v. AitkenNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- Clark v. Scheels All SportsNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.