Legal Opinion

Crouch v. Shantz

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1916No. 9,529PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Erom St. Joseph Superior Court; George Ford, Judge. Action by Jeptha Crouch and others against J. Milton Shantz and another. Erom a judgment for defendants, the plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, P. J.

Appellants filed a complaint in the court below to recover on four promissory notes and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure them. Appellee J. Milton Shantz filed an answer of general denial and three paragraphs of counterclaim. A reply of three paragraphs was filed. Appellee Mary E. Shantz was found to be insane and a guardian ad litem, was appointed and filed for her an answer in three paragraphs, the first of which was a general denial. To the second and third paragraphs of such answer there was a reply of general denial.

A trial by the court resulted in a judgment that appellees recover…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lauster v. MeyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hatfield v. RookerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Pope v. VoigtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Board of Commissioners v. Tincher Motor Car Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Kinney v. HeuringIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coil v. SchetterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API