Legal Opinion

Toy v. Griffith Oldsmobile Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1955No. Docket 14, Calendar 46,375PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Defendant Griffith Oldsmobile Com-

pany, a Michigan corporation, sold an • Oldsmobile automobile on conditional sales contract and assigned the contract to defendant General Motors Acceptance Corporation. In the record the words defendant and defendants are used interchangeably and in referring to them it is not necessary to determine which one or both of them is intended, as liability, were there any, is asserted against both of them. Default was made in the payments on the contract and after repossession, one of the defendants, the record does not show which, advertised the sale of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Attorney General v. Contract Purchase Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Drew v. John Deere Co. of Syracuse, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API