St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. City of Wetumka
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This was an action by the plaintiff in error against the city of We-tumka and others to cancel a certain special assessment levied for paving purposes by said city of Wetumka, which paving was laid along one of the city’s principal streets and across plaintiff’s railroad and right of way. The plaintiff, in addition thereto, asked injunctive relief against the collection of the assessment.
The basis of th'e plaintiff’s complaint is that the$ city, in extending its pavement across the. railroad and its right of way, failed to apportion the cost of the paving to all the property benefited by the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- City of Muskogee v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Newberry v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Wilson v. SimmonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1896
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American-First National Bank v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Wrightsman v. StevensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Yeaman v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Paine v. City of GuymonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947