Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Larkin

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The appellants, as proponents, petitioned for the admission to probate of a will, and a codicil thereto, executed on March 22, 1921, and April IS, 1921, respectively, by Moses Burns, who died in December, 1930. Pursuant to an order for a hearing on that petition, due notice was given of the time and place for proving that will and codicil. Objections to the probate of those instruments were filed on the usual grounds of incompetency and undue influence, and also on the ground that said will w.as not the last will of the deceased, but was revoked by him before his death. On the hearing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Will on DardisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Graef v. KanouseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hocks v. SprangersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Knudson v. GeorgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Taylor v. HoytWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ferriter v. BorthwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  2. Estate of YahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Bruckner v. KalbskopfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Vollmer v. LuetyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  5. Helgert v. LuedkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API