Legal Opinion

Fox v. Aced

California Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1957No. S. F. 19484PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs for the sum of $2,950 after trial before the court without a jury, in an action to recover damages pursuant to the provisions of section 3306 of the Civil Code for an alleged breach of an agreement for the exchange of real property, defendants appeal.

*383On July 2, 1954, plaintiffs and defendants entered into an exchange agreement whereby plaintiffs, in exchange for certain industrial property, were to convey a certain house and lot to defendants and pay them $14,000 in cash. The industrial property was subject to a lease and purchase agreement between…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wolfsen v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. United States v. Homestake Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  3. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Bonesteel v. BonesteelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Perry v. Washington National Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Morgan Guaranty Trust Company Of New York v. American Savings And Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. Rosener v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Stanton v. Astra Pharmaceutical ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Pierce v. PenmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API