Legal Opinion

Baum v. Greyhound Corp.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 15, 1979No. 50,642PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Meyer, J.:

This is an action by the claimant, Helen Baum, to recover compensation. The workmen’s compensation fund (fund) was made a party to the proceedings upon motion by the respondent and its insurance carrier. The workmen’s compensation examiner entered an order dismissing the fund from the case on the basis that respondent had failed to give notice of claimant’s preexisting handicap to the workmen’s compensation director as provided by statute. The district court sustained the examiner’s order dismissing the fund and the respondent and its insurance carrier appeal.

The issue herein is…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. United Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Fierro v. Stanley's HardwareNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Morgan v. Inter-Collegiate Press & Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
  4. Baum v. Greyhound Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  5. Fierro v. Stanley's HardwareNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API