Legal Opinion

People v. Pierce

California Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1967No. Crim. No. 10534PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

Defendant, Clarence Pierce, was held to answer on an information charging him with two counts of perjury. His motion to set aside the information under section *55995 of the Penal Code was granted by the superior court, and the People appeal from the ensuing dismissal.1

The charges of perjury arose from two allegations made by Pierce in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The first count of the information was based on Pierce’s statement in the petition that a deputy sheriff who arrested him on November 11, 1964, struck him in the abdomen several times with a flashlight, and the second count, on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In Re FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. In Re RiddleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. MacKenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. People v. SagehornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. HedgecockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Edmund Y. Chein v. Richard Shumsky, Chief Probation Officer, La County California State Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. People v. KobrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Kulshrestha v. First Union Commercial Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API