Legal Opinion

Seibel v. Fisher

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 17, 1931No. 40849PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

The preceding statement as to the issue submitted calls for a brief recital on the factual side. It is alleged that the note in suit was executed on the first day of August, 1924, and payable on the first day of October, 1924, in the sum of $240, with interest at 8% after maturity; that the note was given by the defendant Fisher in consideration for 1500 pounds of hog remedy manufactured and sold to defendant by T. E. Welch, the payee of the note in question, and that subsequently and on the 10th day of August, 1924, the payee Welch sold this note for a valuable consideration to the plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chismore v. ChismoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  2. Grimes Savings Bank v. McHargSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Farmers & Traders State Bank of Bonaparte v. First National Bank of FarmingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Ainsworth Savings Bank v. ColthurstSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Douglass v. MathenySupreme Court of Iowa · 1872

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of EarlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API