Legal Opinion

Hale v. Hale

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1955PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

On February 3, 1940, the petitioner and the respondent, then husband and wife, became owners as tenants by the entirety of a parcel of real estate in Newton. On June 5, 1940, the petitioner executed a quitclaim deed to the respondent by which she conveyed to him “all . . . [her] right, title and interest” in the property. The instrument contained what purported to be a proper acknowledgment dated June 5, 1940, and it was recorded on that day. Following a rescript from this court in 328 Mass. 652 the parties were divorced by a decree which became absolute on December 3, 1951. The petitioner…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pineo v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Bernatavicius v. BernataviciusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Pray v. StebbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  4. Licker v. GluskinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Hunt, Et Ux. v. CovingtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bruce v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Campagna v. CampagnaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. Keville v. McKeeverMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  4. Swartz v. SherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. Ronan v. RonanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API