Legal Opinion

J. D. Pflaumer, Inc. v. United States Department of Justice

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 13, 1979No. Civ. A. 77-1723PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

VanARTSDALEN, Judge.

Plaintiffs seek redress against defendant government agents for a search and seizure conducted on plaintiffs’ business premises in alleged violation of their fourth amendment rights. In both the complaint and the amended complaint, plaintiffs allege the involvement of their attorneys in certain conversations and agreements concerning the records seized. Plaintiffs’ counsel’s participation appears to have been substantial, and is the subject of no fewer than nine paragraphs of factual allegations in the amended complaint. Consequently, defendants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. American Gym, Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Leon Kroungold and Thaddeus S. Bochey v. Stanton L. TriesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Lieb v. American Pacific International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States & Canada v. Delpro Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
  4. LeaseAmerica Corp. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  5. Commercial Credit Business Loans, Inc. v. MartinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API