Legal Opinion

HE Butt Grocery Company v. Resendez

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1999No. 97-1122PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Per curiam

Can mere display of produce for customer sampling constitute an unreasonable risk of harm to customers? The court of appeals said yes. 1 We say no. We reverse the court of appeals judgment and render judgment that plaintiff take nothing.

While shopping at an H.E. Butt Grocery Company store, Maria Resendez slipped and fell near two grape displays. She sued HEB for negligence, alleging that the customer sampling display posed an unreasonable risk of harm that caused her injuries. The trial court rendered judgment on a jury verdict for Resendez. The court of appeals affirmed.

From the undisputed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keetch v. Kroger Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. ResendezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. CMH Homes, Inc. v. DaenenTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Brookshire Grocery Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Hall v. Sonic Drive-In of Angleton, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  4. Reliable Consultants, Inc. v. Jaquez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  5. Fisher v. Big Y Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API