Legal Opinion

Cook v. Haynes

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1979No. Docket 78-3507Published

1Opinion of the Court

92 Mich. App. 288 (1979)

284 N.W.2d 479

COOK

v.

HAYNES

Docket No. 78-3507.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided September 5, 1979.

Smith & Brooker, P.C. (by Michael J. Huffman), for plaintiffs.

Biringer, Jacox & Hutchinson, P.C., for defendants Hudson.

Before: M.F. CAVANAGH, P.J., and R.M. MAHER and W. VAN VALKENBURG,[*] JJ.

M.F. CAVANAGH, P.J.

The pertinent facts in this dispute are succinctly stated in our brother's opinion. Further amplification at this point is unnecessary. We write to state the reasons for which we would reverse the court below.

It is clear from case law that the failure of an attorney…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Banta v. SerbanMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Macarthur Patton Christian Ass'n v. Farm Bureau Insurance GroupMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Butler v. CannMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Heins v. SutphinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API