Bank Independent v. Coats
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, Bank Independent ("the Bank"), appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendant Barbara Coats in this action seeking to set aside, as fraudulent, the assignments of a promissory note and a mortgage securing that note.1 We affirm.
In Pennington v. Bigham, 512 So.2d 1344, 1346 (Ala. 1987), this Court set out the pertinent law dealing with fraudulent conveyances and assignments:
"The law on fraudulent conveyances [and assignments] is expressed in § 8-9-6, Code 1975:
" 'All conveyances or assignments in writing, or otherwise, of any estate or interest in real or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- JC Jacobs Banking Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Morgan v. MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Smith v. WilderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Granberry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burrows v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Bank Independent v. CoatsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Floyd v. EdmondsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Wicker v. HallmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
- Burrows v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.