Legal Opinion

Bank Independent v. Coats

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 27, 1991No. 1901079PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Bank Independent ("the Bank"), appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendant Barbara Coats in this action seeking to set aside, as fraudulent, the assignments of a promissory note and a mortgage securing that note.1 We affirm.

In Pennington v. Bigham, 512 So.2d 1344, 1346 (Ala. 1987), this Court set out the pertinent law dealing with fraudulent conveyances and assignments:

"The law on fraudulent conveyances [and assignments] is expressed in § 8-9-6, Code 1975:
" 'All conveyances or assignments in writing, or otherwise, of any estate or interest in real or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. JC Jacobs Banking Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Morgan v. MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Smith v. WilderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  5. Granberry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burrows v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Bank Independent v. CoatsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Floyd v. EdmondsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Wicker v. HallmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  5. Burrows v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API