Legal Opinion

Gannon v. Albright

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 22, 1904PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis County Circuit Court. — No». Rudolph Hirsel, Judge. (1) The will conferred npon the two sons, Michael, Jr., and Joseph, a fee simple, conpled with an absolute power of alienation. For this' reason the devise over, under which the plaintiffs claim, is void. 4 Kent, Com. (10 Ed.), p. 270; 2 Washb. Real Prop.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis County Circuit Court. — No». Rudolph Hirsel, Judge. (1) The will conferred npon the two sons, Michael, Jr., and Joseph, a fee simple, conpled with an absolute power of alienation. For this' reason the devise over, under which the plaintiffs claim, is void. 4 Kent, Com. (10 Ed.), p. 270; 2 Washb. Real Prop. (6 Ed.), 667; Tiedeman, Real Prop., sec. 398; Jackson v. Bull, 10 John. 19; Jackson v. Robins, 15 John. 169,16 John. 537; Helmer v. Shoemaker, 22 Wend. 137; Yan Home v. Campbell, 100 N. Y. 287; Ide v. Ide, 5 Mass. 500; Melson v. Doe, 4 Leigh 408; Riddick v. Cohoon, 4…

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.

This is an action of ejectment. Michael J. Gannon is the common source of title to the lot in suit.

Upon the construction of the fourth clause of the will of Michael J. Gannon the rights of both sides to this controversy depend. The said clause is in these words:

“Fourth. I give, devise and bequeath unto my two sons, Michael J. Gannon, Jr., and Joseph E. Gannon and unto their heirs and assigns forever, my farm lying and being in the county of St. Louis and State of Missouri which lies in the southern limits of Kirkwood, containing eighty acres, be the same more or less. It is my will that the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Van Horne v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Howard v. CarusiSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Kelley v. MeinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. Roth v. RauschenbuschSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. Small v. FieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Joseph Davidow Newman, Debtor. Robert M. Magill, Trustee-Appellant v. Joseph Davidow Newman, Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Elsea v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  3. McCune v. GoodwillieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. First and American National Bank v. HigginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. Armor v. FreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1910

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API