Legal Opinion

Schuminsky v. Field

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1980No. 54476PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

For our determination in this original proceeding, there arises the question of whether the defendants in a forcible entry and detention (or detainer) action may assert counterclaims seeking a money judgment based on claims for damages to their property and income allegedly due to the failure of their landlord to keep the property in a good state of repair and his allegedly permitting a competitive business to be set up contrary to the parties’ written agreement. We hold that under our statute they may not.

Petitioner in this original proceeding, a successor in interest to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schweiger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. S. P. Growers Ass'n v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Elias v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. D'Amico v. RiedelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Hart v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ghost Hollow Trust v. O'QuinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. City College, Inc. v. Moore Sorrento, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API