Schuminsky v. Field
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
For our determination in this original proceeding, there arises the question of whether the defendants in a forcible entry and detention (or detainer) action may assert counterclaims seeking a money judgment based on claims for damages to their property and income allegedly due to the failure of their landlord to keep the property in a good state of repair and his allegedly permitting a competitive business to be set up contrary to the parties’ written agreement. We hold that under our statute they may not.
Petitioner in this original proceeding, a successor in interest to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schweiger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- S. P. Growers Ass'n v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Elias v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- D'Amico v. RiedelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Hart v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ghost Hollow Trust v. O'QuinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- City College, Inc. v. Moore Sorrento, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010