Legal Opinion
St. Croix Waterway Ass'n v. Meyer
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 18, 1996No. Civil 4-96-58PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MASON, United States Magistrate Judge.
The above matter eame on for hearing before the undersigned Magistrate Judge on July 29, 1996 upon Defendant Rodney San-do’s Motion to Dismiss [Docket Nos. 11 and 12] and upon Defendant George Meyer’s Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 22]. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and related Rules of this Court, the parties waived their right to proceed before a United States District Judge and voluntarily consented to have all proceedings in this case conducted and determined by the undersigned Magistrate Judge. It was so ordered by District…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- St. Croix Waterway v. George MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- No. 98-1216Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999