United States v. Norris
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Criminal prosecution by tlic United States against Michael Norris, John Haley, and John Lynch. On motions in arrest of judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
[1] The indictment filed January 26, 1915, charges a conspiracy to violate section 1 of Sherman Act July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209 (Comp. St. § 8820), denouncing conspiracies in restraint of interstate commerce and making any such violation a misdemeanor. It was found after the passage of the Clayton Act, effective October 15, 1914 (38 Stat. 730, c. 323), but describes an alleged conspiracy formed before the adoption of the latter act. My construction of section 20 of the Clayton Act (Comp. St. § 1243d) is that it legalizes regular and proper strikes by trade…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Bannon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mercer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
- United States v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1943