Legal Opinion

Stansbury v. Barrick Enterprises, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 2024No. 1:22-cv-00342Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MELISSA STANSBURY, : Plaintiff : No. 1:22-cv-00342 : v. : (Judge Kane) : BARRICK ENTERPRISES, INC., and : TODD BARRICK, : Defendants : MEMORANDUM Before the Court are two motions: (1) Plaintiff Melissa Stansbury (“Plaintiff”)’s Motion for Notice to Potential Plaintiffs and for Conditional Certification of a Collective Class (Doc. No. 35) and (2) Defendants Barrick Enterprises, Inc. and Todd Barrick (“Defendants”)’ Motion For Leave to File a Surreply in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. No. 54). For the reasons…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Tai Kwan Cureton v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. In re: Avandia Marketing v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API