Mills Novelty Co. v. Dupouy
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois; Keuesaw M. Dandis, Judge. Action at law by Adolpho Dupouy, trading as A. Dupouy & Co., against the Mills Novelty Company.
Read the full summary
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois; Keuesaw M. Dandis, Judge. Action at law by Adolpho Dupouy, trading as A. Dupouy & Co., against the Mills Novelty Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. - The defendant In error, Adolpho Dupouy, as plaintiff below, sued the Mills Novelty Company, as defendant, and recovered judgment (at law) for moneys expended by the plaintiff, which he alleges were incurred for flues imposed upon him, through a prosecution by the Venezuela government, for transactions in…
1Opinion of the CourtSeaman, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Adolpho Dupouy, a citizen and resident-of Venezuela, as plaintiff in the suit below, recovered judgment against the Mills Novelty Company, an Illinois'company, as defendant, and the parties are referred to in this *257opinion as plaintiff and defendant, respectively, in conformity with their arrangement below. The issues were submitted for trial by the court, without a jury, and special findings of fact were filed, with no assignment of error thereupon; but the issues of law are well preserved for the review sought by the defendant’s writ of error.
The facts…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Harvey v. MerrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Buck v. AlbeeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Du Puy v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1923